- Subjects:Assessment, Curriculum Development, Educational Standards, Test Preparation
Creating a Standardized Assessment Test: Practice Makes Perfect
- Grades: 1–2, 3–5, 6–8, 9–12
If you are going to bother doing something, do it well and make it worth your time. I take that mantra and apply it to almost everything in my classroom, and preparing for standardized tests is no different. Whether you love or hate the nature of high-stakes testing, it is a necessary evil until a better way to ensure equal evaluation of students comes along. Here is how my class attacks the tests head-on and how I ensure high levels of learning in the process.
Assessment Test Plan: Know Your Blueprint
Currently, states have different assessments and information available depending on where you live, but we are moving towards common assessments with the implementation of Common Core. No matter your assessment, there is a blueprint somewhere. Know exactly how long each test is, what the sections are, and how they are to be administered. Can your students use calculators on any one part? Blueprints, sometimes called “specs” or “specifications,” tell you exactly what skills will be tested and how many points each question is worth. They may include important details, like which questions require open-ended responses and what will not be included as well. Find your blueprint and know it inside and out. Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium offers potential blueprints for common assessments, and more definite blueprints will surface as Common Core assessments are created.
Ask the Right Questions
Find sample tests and dissect them. Many times questions are asked in a very prescribed format. We take the sample books, examples from presentations, and any other test-prep material we can find and pull the question stems. Question stems are going to be the format you want to ask all your practice questions in. For example, I know that my students will be asked about author’s purpose. The question stem might say, “Why did the author most likely write this passage?” Knowing how the question will be asked allows me to create similar questions for my students. If the test is going to use italics instead of bold words, then so am I. If the test says “provide evidence,” then I’m not going to say “give examples.” I’m going to say exactly what the test does. Here is one example of the question stems I use in 4th grade English language arts.
Open-Ended Preparation
Assessments may include open-ended responses. These questions require students to write responses or show their work and reasoning. Again, we check the blueprint and figure out what questions could be asked in an open-ended way. Then, we find question stems that mirror those on sample tests. While we are learning throughout the year, we adapt test questions to this format so that students are used to writing their responses. We get out the rubrics and show students how to grade open-ended questions, so they know exactly what will be required. As we get closer to test time, students participate in a guided response before tackling a similar question on their own daily. Yes, I said daily.
Both reading and math open-ended questions are practiced each day throughout much of the year, so they are commonplace and students are ready to respond. I try to make it as easy as possible. For math, I took the sample questions and created four or five of each question, just changing the figures. Copied into binders, these sets can be used over and over without making excess copies! Critical Literacy: Enhancing Students’ Comprehension of Text is a great resource for developing great open-ended questions.
Assembling an Assessment Test
Once you know the number and type of each kind of question, and you have the wording down, you are ready to assemble your test. Make your test as much like
the real format as possible. If your blueprint says that there are seven questions about double-digit multiplication and you know the different ways the question might be asked, then your assessment should also have seven questions asked in the same way. I have test “blanks” that I use. Our math and reading tests are given in the same format, with numbers going down the columns and each question in a box. I retype all my tests into this format so that it is familiar to the students.
Going back to the blueprint can also give clues about the answer document. We run sample documents provided by the state. If a response must be gridded, we get the exact grid. If answers are on lined paper, we use the same paper the test will have.
Taking Time to Test
My school has what we call “shutdowns.” A shutdown is basically a practice run for the real test. The test will start in the morning and run for a specific length of time. During that time, there is no movement in the hallways and all classes are testing the entire time. We prepare our assessments and documents ahead of time and proctor the test in the same way as will happen with the real test. My grade usually does reading one day and math the next, but that varies by grade level with some classes testing both subjects in one span. We start with short one or one-and-a-half hour tests every month or so early in the school year. As we move through the year, the frequency and time increase. By this point in the year, we are testing every eight days for up to two hours.
Practice Makes Perfect
We don’t simply take tests and that’s that. After an assessment, my class reviews the test. How we review depends on the subject, and I try to change it up to keep everyone’s attention. I might run diagnostics, only spending focused time reviewing the questions we struggled with. I sometimes have students grade each other’s papers, but other times I grade them all and pull small groups to review specific skills. Fellow blogger Alycia has some great ways to keep up engagement during test prep. I reward for improvement and for focus during the test time, more than for final grades. The point? Students know how to answer next time and we hone in on skills that are weak with immediate feedback.
Final Analysis
The work is never done when preparing for these
types of assessment tests. Throughout the year, we are conscious of how we teach and assess our students. When results come in, we spend data meetings highlighting students that fell below desired levels and figure out what skills to work on throughout the year. We take grade-level results and locate weak areas, making specific lesson plans to address those needs. If we only got two out of three points on an open-ended question, we figure out what type of question it might have been and formulate practices to help raise the score.
Is it all about the test? No. As good teachers, we are always looking for ways to move our students forward in all areas, not just on one test. The difference I see in “teaching to the test” and being well prepared is that my students have no surprises in format; they have experience with the types of questions they will be asked; and they have practice responding in writing so that others can read and understand their work. I know that they are better prepared because of the work I do behind the scenes to make sure everything we do has purpose and is written with intention.
How do you prepare for the tests? What resources do you use when making assessments? Do practice tests serve a purpose in your classroom?
Comments (26)
I love this idea! I am wondering if it could be changed a bit by having students create certain sections? I teach 5th grade Language Arts and thought it may be more fun, at the same time the kids will be learning the test from a different angle:)
For sure! When we were doing SAT testing, we had a language arts portion. I love the idea of kids making the test. We do smaller portions of that when kids write their own math problems. That's a great idea to have them make the test - especially in a grammar/writing situation!
I admire your attention to detail and commitment to helping your kids do well on required tests. I teach middle school kids and have them for less than five hours a week. It is hard to figure out time to teach AND prepare like you do in an elementary setting. I do use item specs and practice with them. Excellent information!
You are right - only having those 5 hours would make a huge difference. Sticking to the objectives and specs would be so important with limited time.
Wow - some of the critical commenters here are confusing fantasy with reality. The original poster isn't making the rules but rather giving actionable strategies for making the most of an admittedly flawed educational landscape. Good ideas from this poster as always (I've read several of hers before).
Thank you for being a reader! I think the reality is that education is judged by testing and whether we as teachers like it or not, that's what we are dealing with. I don't always think it is the best, but you can bet my kids will be prepared to show off how much they know!
I applaud your dedication to helping you prepare your students for their testing. For a student of any age to be expected to do well on a standardized test, a well-planned and thorough practice regimen are musts if the student is to have any idea what to expect and be able to focus, think clearly and test as well as possible.
A couple hours every week or so is hardly too much time spent on testing. It's lessons, it's learning, it's dress rehearsal. Playing an instrument growing up, I spent 30 minutes or more every single day, plus an hour a week at lessons and an hour every day in music class, not including the performances in concerts - and that was extracurricular. Why expect anything different from test preparation?
It's the same theory - you have to do anything at least 10 times to become comfortable with it, and in practicing with students regularly, they're learning what it takes to be prepared for testing, while at the same time any overwhelming anxiety about a high-stakes situation is reduced dramatically. That in turn creates a more meaningful experience for the student in the end, because they've learned a real life lesson about working hard to achieve a goal.
So is test-taking the be-all end-all of school? Obviously not. There are hundreds of hours spent in the classroom NOT testing, but learning, developing student-teacher relationships and so much more. But is test-taking an applicable life skill that teaches "practice makes perfect" and performance-based evaluation (who has a job that doesn't involve evaluations?) Absolutely.
Such a great point about job evaluations. What if the rest of the world were judged the way we judge our kids and teachers? And I think it is like another poster said about being prepared for a GRE or LSAT or any of those type of tests too; knowing how to prepare is crucial. Being a good student growing up, I was a bit out of luck when it came to classes I really had to study and prep for. I had to learn it myself! A great analogy with the musical instrument too. I played on drumline in college and we had 30-40 hours a week of practice for a single 10-minute performance each Saturday. Talk about prepping!
Wow! That is truly some sage advice. I can't wait to start implementing these ideas pronto!
Thank you for laying it all out in such an organized way!
I know your students are well prepared for the state test. I bet you are a fabulous teacher. I know just practicing sitting still that long takes several practice rounds!
That's the thing... it isn't meant to kill the kids. It is meant to ease test anxiety and make sure they have practice. Thanks!
"Test taking is NOT a life skill. Reading, writing, math, etc are life skills."
Working on well written open ended responses, and comprehending the text enough to answer the multiple choice questions ARE important life skills. Children who can not respond properly in a written manner are sure to fall behind. If you've ever read a note from a parent, an email regarding a business issue, or even a Facebook post that is difficult to comprehend, you know the importance of this skill. In my opinion, the more practice a student gets in an area, the less stressful it will be on them when the "real thing" arrives. How scared would you feel if you we're asked to take a driving test without practice on the road first? It would be overwhelming, and there would probably be careless mistakes made. Keep up the great work, it'll show in your results :)
Thank you so much for that! You are right. I think through preparing for the test, we are still giving our kids great practice in skills they need such as reading functional text, writing responses, and explaining their reasoning.
Why is this teaching to the test? Using state blueprints and formatting an assessment helps students prepare for tests. Teachers model close reading and annotating text as they prepare and these are college and career ready skills. It just makes sense to align blueprints and assessments. It also makes sense to assess to determine mastery. How many of us have taken classes to prepare for the GRE, the LSAT, or entrance tests for college? Modeling how to prepare for and take a test may be a life-long skill.
Exactly. I think if you were to have a dance recital, you'd practice and prepare while still teaching dance. If you were to have a football game, you'd have a scrimmage while still teaching sportsmanship and good technique. Knowing how to prepare, overcome anxiety, and do your best is not a bad thing. My point being, if you are going to make a practice, make it worth the time and effort by having the best practice possible!
I always love reading your articles and this one is no different. It is very evident you love your job and always do what is best for kids! I too prep my students for state testing. But I am a Kindergarten teacher, therefore my "state testing" is DIBELS. If I did not prepare my students they would be in total shock when they went to test. We talk about the test, we practice and practice ad practice. I want my students to look at DIBELS as a way to show off what they have learned all year. This is done through "mock trials" of the test. My kids do not fear DIBEL time. They embrace it! See Kindergarten and 3rd grade aren't so different after all. Right? :))) Keep doing what it are doing. I love reading your articles and look forward to the next one.
Thank you so much. It is great to hear a lower-grade perspective. You are right - it isn't about stressing them out, it is about relieving that stress by being well prepared. We would prepare for anything else in life, right? I'd love to have my Kindergartener in your class!
"By this point in the year, we are testing every eight days for up to two hours."
dear god, WHEN DO YOU TEACH?
Your kids may be great test takers, but are they learners?
If you think you are not teaching to the test, you are kidding yourselves.
Well, in 8 days, my kids would be in my classroom (not at lunch, PE, etc.) about 48 hours. I'm testing them for 2 of those 48. I'd say I have about 46 hours of instruction going on. That's how I teach. And, I'm not doing "Friday test-day" like so many schools. If you read the rest of my articles you'd see that my kids are engaged in many cross-curricular instructional activities throughout those other 46 hours.
You you think about it -- 7 days, reading test, 7 days, math test... I'm actually testing a whole lot less that people using a basal each week. Every 16 days (that's 3 full school weeks) my kids would take an assessment in a core subject area. A 2-hour test is about 64 questions, 60 multiple choice and 4 open ended. It takes about 30 minutes to review it, which is where a lot of teaching comes in. It isn't teaching to the test, it is learning from mistakes and correcting misconceptions. That's data-driven instruction and using formative assessments to drive what to teach next.
"By this point in the year, we are testing every eight days for up to two hours." This is absolutely teaching to the test. Students should be learning how to be successful in life, not how to pass a test. A pro-testing principal once said to me, "Test-taking is a life skill." Test taking is NOT a life skill. Reading, writing, math, etc are life skills. Let the assessment test the knowledge, not have the learning be lead by the assessment.
I guess it is how you make your test. My kids have to read and respond in writing. They have to write their thinking for math. It isn't a test-skill in that case. Teaching to the test would imply I only teach what is on that test. That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying if I'm going to make a PRACTICE test I'm going to make it look like the real test. That only makes sense. Would you have your kids practice basketball to get ready for a football game?
This is entirely too much time spent on test prep. My old school used to do this. The kids thought education was all about testing. You say, Is it all about the test? "No." But then you say, "By this point in the year, we are testing every eight days for up to two hours." That's too much about the test. Teach well and the students should do well. Even better...assess them on what they're learning, don't teach them on what they'll be tested.
Our tests are based on our standards. I teach our standards, so assessing them IS based on what they are learning. We are also finishing the year. At this point we have covered most of the material required and are prepping them for further thinking and diving deeper.
Students will not perform well on anything they do for the first time, especially if it is odd to them. If I'm going to have them read and respond in writing anyway, why not put it in the same little boxes so it looks familiar? If I'm going to teach them fractions anyway, why not phrase the fraction questions similar to how the assessment will be? It isn't the only thing that we do, it is one thing that we do. If you look at my other posts you'd notice I do a lot of learning activities. Also, it is about 2 hours out of 48 (if you add all the in-class time over 8 days) which doesn't seem like very much to me.
It makes so much sense spelled out like that! I never feel like my tests quite fit what we get from the state. I'll have to find our blueprints and get to work.
How do you manage the copying and printing of it all? Do you consume all the books each year?
Thanks, Rosie! The copying can be a big problem. We used to have copies at our school, so it was just a matter of paper. Our principal was great about running them for us when she worked on the weekends, so if we pulled materials, that's all we had to do. Now there is a centeralized copy system for the district and that puts some limits on it. Thankfully, we have all our past tests saved and can just regenerate answer documents for the most part. We also have test books purchased that we use year to year. This year, we've been able to consume a lot of them because the state test won't exist next year!
































