Administrator Magazine
Scholastic Administrator is a must-read resource for 240,000 of today's results-driven school leaders. Every issue features leadership for education executives, insight and analysis into what's next in education, and reporting on cutting-edge technologies in real life applications.

Smart Talk

The Toledo peer-review program’s founder has one goal: Weed out the bad teachers, bring in the new.

Dal Lawrence<br />
Dal Lawrence

Teachers, it turns out, are tougher on each other than anyone else.

That’s one of the lessons of Toledo’s 25-year-old peer-review program, in which veteran teachers sift out the timid, disorganized, or otherwise unfit. Today some 70 NEA and AFT districts—mostly in California, Connecticut, and Ohio—use the approach. Teachers, least of all it seems, want to share the lunchroom with someone who can’t hack it in the classroom.

On the hot seat, former Toledo local president Dal Lawrence answers our tough questions:

Q: What was the original idea behind peer review?
A: I wanted to apply the medical model to teaching. Doctors have internships, periods of residencies, and really tough standards. Experienced doctors guide the younger ones.

Q: Who are the reviewers with the peer-review program?
A: They are experienced teachers who the program’s governing board has selected very carefully. They serve full time for three years, then return to the classroom.

Q: How do the standards of  teacher-reviewers compare to those of administrators?
A: Toledo Public Schools had not dismissed a single teacher for poor teaching practice in the five years before 1981 when we started the peer-review program. Twenty-seven years later, nearly 450 underperforming teachers are no longer teaching in Toledo.

Q: Which is better, peer-review or merit pay?      
A: If you want to change the way people work, and the way they look at themselves and each other as professionals, don’t start by messing with their paychecks.

Q: Is there any evidence that teachers are working harder to avoid getting reviewed?
A: I doubt it. Most of our 2,300 teachers have been interns in the district. They know the process.

Q: Who are the teachers who don’t make it through peer review?
A: They’re the teachers who have a problem with instructional leadership, or who lack “stage presence.” They are teachers who are too timid, or sometimes just afraid of students, and it goes downhill fast. Some come out of college as dumb as they were when they went in.

Q: Why the intense scrutiny on brand-new teachers right off the bat?
A: We want to shorten the learning curve from five years to one, and we want to find out who should teach and who should not. No one has a vested interest in incompetence.

Q: How many new teachers get weeded out?
A: On average 92 percent of interns are successful and continue on as teachers.

Q: What about teachers who come from other districts—do they get reviewed as well?
A: If you’re new to our system, you get reviewed.

Q: Ever regretted a panel decision to remove a teacher from the classroom?
A: Once, the panel voted to dismiss an elementary teacher. I argued for a second chance, and after considerable discussion and regret, they gave her one. Big mistake! She was awful again, and I was never allowed to forget it.

Q: Why has peer review been slow to catch on?
A: Schools are run like automobile plants were six decades ago. We’re still building kids like General Motors used to build cars. They changed, and we haven’t.   

  • Teacher Store
  • The Teacher Store  
    RTI: Assessments & Remediation for K–2

    RTI: Assessments & Remediation for K–2

    by Dr. Brenda M. Weaver

    Reading expert Brenda M. Weaver has developed an assessment system that enables you to screen students and monitor their progress in reading and writing all year long. Perfect for fulfilling the requirements of RTI (Response to Intervention), these ready-to-go assessments will help you identify students who are making adequate progress, those who need extra support, and those who need intense intervention. Each assessment is linked to research-based intervention strategies that put the tools you need to provide targeted support at your fingertips. This updated and revised version of Ready-to-Use Reading Assessments and Intervention Strategies for K-2 includes record-keeping forms and ten reproducible assessment mini-books!

    $20.99 You save: 25%
    Professional Book | Grades K-2
    Add To Cart
    Educators Only
    RTI: Assessments & Remediation for K–2
    Grades K-2 $20.99
    Add To Cart
  • Teacher Store
  • The Teacher Store  
    Sense Suspense - Activity Sheet

    Sense Suspense - Activity Sheet

    Scholastic’s downloadable worksheets for students offer a varied selection of tasks that require reading for meaning through many fun and strategic activities. The rich content of our title-specific blackline masters incorporates writing exercises, graphic organizers, deductive reasoning, critical thinking, vocabulary development, and much, much more. Through innovative exercises, students will enjoy a range of activities that require them to engage in post-reading reflections that include but are not limited to understanding character development, imagining new endings, connecting with text-based information, plus a focus on important age-appropriate reading strategies such as summarizing, comparing/contrasting, problem solving, synthesizing, determining cause and effect and many others. From phonics to fluency, the Scholastic downloadable worksheets offer meaningful engagement for students in grades K-12. Now available for a special selection of our most popular fiction and nonfiction paperbacks. Perfect for a learning center activity, skill reinforcement, take-home, informal self-assessment, and monitoring independent reading.

    Worksheet | Grades PreK-K
    Add To Cart
    Educators Only
    Sense Suspense - Activity Sheet
    Grades PreK-K $2.95
    Add To Cart
Help | Privacy Policy




(Separate multiple email addresses with commas)

Check this box to send yourself a copy of the email.


Scholastic respects your privacy. We do not retain or distribute lists of email addresses.