Administrator
Administr@tor MagazineLeadershipStaff DevelopmentCurriculum & InstructionFundingTechnology

Visit READ180


Special Education and Reading Intervention: The Need

The number of special education students in the U.S. has almost doubled over the past twenty-five years. These students now represent a substantial and rising percentage of the total population in U.S. schools. Of the six million students enrolled in special education programs, half have been identified as having a specific learning disability, which the Federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) defines as:

A disorder in one or more of the basic psychological processes involved in understanding or in using language, spoken or written, that may manifest itself in an imperfect ability to listen, think, speak, read, write, spell, or to do mathematical calculations, including conditions such as perceptual disabilities, brain injury, minimal brain dysfunction, dyslexia, and developmental aphasia. (The President 's Commission on Excellence in Special Education, 2002,and Teaching LD.org,2002)

Statistics show that many of these students fail to reach the academic achievements of their peers. In an effort to investigate opportunities to improve the performance of special education students nationwide, President George Bush created The President's Commission on Excellence in Special Education in 2001. After months of public hearings and evidence gathering, the Commission released its findings and recommendations in a report entitled "A New Era: Revitalizing Special Education for Children and Their Families." The findings are sobering. The report states that students with disabilities are twice as likely to drop out of school as their peers. Even more troubling is the Commission's conclusion concerning why the majority of students with specific learning disabilities are placed into special education programs

"…simply because they have not learned to read. Thus, many children identified for special education — up to 40% — are there because they were not taught to read. The reading difficulties may not be their only area of difficulty, but it's the area that resulted in special education placement. Sadly, few children placed in special education close the achievement gap to a point where they can read and learn like their peers.(The President's Commission on Excellence in Special Education,2002)

Thus, a staggering 2.4 million students are enrolled into special education programs because of an inability to read. Clearly, many children are not responding to the reading instruction they are receiving, whether in the general education classroom or the special education classroom.

In its major recommendations, the Commission set three overarching goals:

  1. "Focus on results — not on process." Thus, schools need to concentrate on results and not be consumed by process and procedures.
  2. "Embrace a model of prevention, not a model of failure." In other words, implementing changes to identify and prevent learning disabilities, rather than dealing with students once they have failed, should be the primary objective.
  3. "Consider children with disabilities as general education children first." Thus, general education and special education should not be treated as separate systems. Instead, general education and special education should share the responsibilities in areas of cost, instruction, and identification. (The President's Commission on Excellence in Special Education, 2002)

The Commission's recommendations, particularly in the areas of accountability and results, were also affirmed in the 2002 Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), also known as the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). Going forward, educational standards and school accountability systems must also apply to students with disabilities (National Association of State Directors of Special Education, 2002).

As a result of the above policy changes and other federal legislation, many schools have adopted the practice of inclusion, in which students with disabilities participate in general education classrooms. Consequently, many teachers now need to provide appropriate instruction for an even wider range of student needs. The current environment of decreasing funds has made this task especially difficult. In order to meet these demands, districts are seeking innovative, cost-effective, and proven programs that meet the needs of all students.

With a growing population of struggling readers in special education programs, the need for an effective and research-based solution is critical. READ 180 meets the needs of Special Needs students and offers them the potential to succeed. After over a dozen years of academic and classroom research, READ 180 is producing quantifiable improvements in reading achievement among struggling readers in special education programs across the country.

School Studies
The following school success studies demonstrate the effectiveness of structured reading intervention on student reading achievement in special education programs.

 

 

Scholastic Administrator Partners
COSN Technology Leadership Network ASB AASA AASPA SETDA